By Sam Sanare
One tongkat ali scam currently making its rounds is to trick people out of their money by presenting forged or irrelevant licenses of the Indonesian government, as well as forged lab tests.
Irrelevant licenses are, for example, licenses pertaining to a business registration.
Even street vendors of newspapers need to have such a Gewerbeschein, and so do drug-addicted youth selling their hand-made jewelery.
The following licenses are issued to any Indonesian who applies for them:
SIUP – Surat Izin Usaha Perdagangan – general business permit; every Indonesian business obtains this simply by request
TDP – Tanda Daftar Perusahaan – business registration; just a fancy registration receipt
HO – Surat Izin Gangguan – a permit to cause disturbance; every Indonesian business has this
Akte Pendirian Usaha – a simple notarized form of business registration
It may not be as quick as in Germany, but all of the above are a mere formality, and cost only nominal fees.
Any Indonesian website selling tongkat ali that tries to project an image of legality and credibility by publishing such irrelevant documents on their website is taking consumers for a ride… and it’s likely to be an expensive ride for the mislead buyer, both financially and in terms of the damage done to his or her health.
The single relevant license that an Indonesian business selling tongkat ali must possess is a Nomor Depkes.
The Nomor Depkes is a product-specific registration code that permits a product to be sold as medicine or traditional medicine.
Any buyer of any tongkat ali product originating from Indonesia, or claiming to originate from Indonesia, should demand from the vendor the Nomor Depkes. If the vendor cannot provide this, it is obvious that the product is a fake, and most likely a dangerous one on top of that.
Now, if a supplier comes up with a Nomor Depkes, feel free to write to me. You may want to do this because some illegitimate distributors just usurp a Nomor Depkes from a legitimate sources, and I can show you how to find out.
Furthermore, I have seen documents in the name of a woman who has been named after the city of Medan. These documents misrepresented a large production facility belonging to “Sumatra Pasak Bumi” as belonging to her and her outfit, established just a few month ago.
If ever you want graphic proof of how authentic a company is, look for photos. Photos are not as easy to manipulate as are scans of “licenses”. Any genuine company will include on their website photos of their buildings, their staff, their raw materials, and their production processes.
1 Vincent J. Gnoffo, Requiring a Thumbprint for Notarized Transactions: The Battle against Document Fraud, HeinOnline, Rev. 803 (1997-1998).
2 Amy E. Robillard and Ron Fortune, Toward A New Content for Writing Courses: Literary Forgery, Plagiarism, and the Production of Belief, JAC, Vol. 27, No. 1/2 (2007), pp. 185-210.
3 Yael Navaro-Yashin, Make-believe papers, legal forms and the counterfeit Affective interactions between documents and people in Britain and Cyprus, SAGE Journals, Anthropological Theory March 2007 vol. 7 no. 1 79-98.
4 Justin Picard, Claus Vielhauer, Niels Thorwirth, Towards fraud-proof ID documents using multiple data hiding technologies and biometrics, SPIE Digital Library, From Conference Volume 5306 (June 22, 2004).
5 David L. Greenaway, Documents embossed with optical markings representing genuineness information, Jan 22, 1980.
6 Berg, I. A., A comparative study of forgery., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 28(3), Jun 1944, 232-238.
7 Eggert, Paul, Authenticity and forgery: ‘this branch of human wickedness’: a review article. [Review of Forged Documents: Proceedings of the 1989 Houston Conference], Bulletin (Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand) Volume 15 Issue 1 (Sept 1991) ISSN: 0084-7852
8 WANG Yue, The Procedure and Key Points for Examination of Forged Printed Documents, Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences 2012-02.
9 A Jessica Fridrich , B David Soukal , A Jan Lukas, Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images, Proceedings of Digital Forensic Research Workshop.(2003).
10 WANG Lizhi, Inspection of Changed and Forged Computer-Printed Documents, Journal of Liaoning Police Academy 2005-05.
11 Mohammed B. Hemraj, The Crime of Forgery, Emerald Insight, Journal of Financial Crime Vol. 9 Iss: 4, pp.355 – 359 1993.
12 LI De-ying, LU Yu, WANG Kong-bao, Systematic Examination of Forged Documents with Authentic Seal Stamps, Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences 2002-01.
13 Tkachenko, I., Puech, W., Strauss, O., Gaudin, J.-M., Fighting against forged documents by using textured image, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, pp. 790-794.
Samuel P. Huntington, Democracy’s Third Wave Project MUSE Scholarly Journals Online
Herbert Feith, The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia 2007
J. Leyser, Legal Developments in Indonesia, The American Journal of Comparative Law
Vol. 3, No. 3 (Summer, 1954), pp. 399-411
James H. Mysbergh, The Indonesian Elite, Far Eastern Survey
Vol. 26, No. 3 (Mar., 1957), pp. 38-42
arel A. Steenbrink, Dutch Colonialism and Indonesian Islam: Contacts and Conflicts, 1596-1950, Amsterdam – New York 2006
Bruce Schneier, Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World, Wiley Publishing 2004
Thomas A. Johnson, Forensic Computer Crime Investigation 2005 Taylor & Francis Group